Not sure about you but I love changing gear. Whether I'm stuck in crawling traffic (most of the time then) or swapping cogs on a country lane, to me it's all part of driving pleasure.
I love the control and precision I can perfect with each movement. Easing out the clutch and slotting in the cogs with a smoothness that means passengers can barely tell I've changed gear.
It's a choice we take for granted and can often find a chore but when it works it feels fantastic - stirring the engine until it begs for mercy then swiftly exchanging metal teeth only to wind it back up again can send a shiver down my spine.
But as the government continues to strip away more and more of our driving freedom (just don't get me started on that) surely the ever-persecuted motorist would try to hang on to every last piece of mechanical pleasure that we have?
It seems not. The death-knell of the manual gearbox is nigh, and that makes me sad. As technology continues to impress us with life saving traction control systems, handbrake buttons and intelligent airbags we are losing the fight to hold on to the one the most original car devices known.
Many people in the car industry are convinced that manual gearboxes have had their time and that, in the future at least, light-weight, technology-smart automatic boxes will rule.
So why do people 'opt' for automatics? Are they lazy? Have they forgotten how to change gear? Did they ever learn how to? Or maybe it's convenience? Perhaps they were bombarded by the salesman's baffling talk of cutting-edge technology? Yes, I can see how a 'self shifter' may suit certain situations, the older generation may find it a benefit, but as twenty-something who's mad about cars I can't think of anything worse.
Knowing where to start is a tough one - but I reckon I can put up a good fight against these unnecessary contraptions. So here goes:
Firstly, from an environmental point of view, automatics don't yet have enough advantages to make them a sensible choice - cars with automatics always pollute the air more with higher Co2 emissions, and also weigh more than a manual gearbox, which harms fuel economy further.
As manual boxes are mostly standard on cars you'll have to shell out for an auto, and I dread to think of the costs involved if one decided not to shift. Performance also suffers as the torque converter saps the power. And why is it that people that end up driving into the neighbour's swimming pool or dining room always blame a car's auto box?
Convinced yet? Well I haven't finished - I haven't even started on all the confusing collections of semi-auto's and sequential boxes out there, BMW's jerky SMG, Citroen's awful 'sensodrive' and all the other silly flappy-paddle versions on the market.
I truly have to question the point of this all 'forward thinking' technology. You might think you look (and feel) like Lewis Hamilton when blipping through the paddles of your semi-automatic F1 style, but I guarantee the novelty will soon wear off.
Have you ever tried to reverse into a tight space with no clutch? Or attempted a hill start with a handbrake button and a paddle? If the paddles are attached to the steering wheel you'll struggle to change gear when turning as you wrap your arms in a knot, and when attached to the steering column you can't even change gear when cornering. Still feeling like a race champ? Oh, and don't forget you're probably at least £1,000 poorer over a manual driver.
Even those auto-loving Americans have decided they're not always a good idea. The BMW M5 comes only with a flappy-paddle box but the Americans insisted they were given the choice of a manual stick - and they got it! Good for them. In a country where autos rule it shows that real drivers can still spot the overpriced gimmicks. Unfortunately Britain won't be given the same option.
You might say I'm not moving with technology and being too much of a traditionalist but why try to reinvent something that works so well. It's been with us for decades, is enjoyable and completes your connection with the heart of your car - the engine. What next, cars that steer themselves? (thanks Volvo). Cars that brake themselves? (thanks Mercedes).
I strongly believe that if you're a true motoring fan then you'd always go for a manual. Even when 'dreaming' of cars on Autotrader I always select the transmission option to 'MANUAL' only.
Even some of my favourite cars, which include the new BMW X5 (auto only) a Smart roadster (great car but automated-manual only) and sadly most Mercs, I can honestly say that I will never buy just because of they don't allow true driver-involvement.
True one day I might not have a choice in the matter and we'll all be driven round in our steering wheel-less, hydrogen-powered, emission-free autuomatic milk-floats, but for now you can stick it.
Do you prefer a manual or automatic gearbox? Vote here